Graduate Diploma in Intellectual Property Law
Course code: 276AA
March, June, July, August, December
AUD $24,992 (2026 indicative first year fee). Commonwealth Supported Places (CSPs) are not available
March, June, July, August, December
AUD $30,496 (2026 indicative first year fee)
IELTS 6.5: with no band less than 6.0
Course structure
Overview
Course structure
The Graduate Diploma in Intellectual Property Law requires successfully completing 50 credit points.
Students must complete:
- a minimum of 37.5 credit points of IP subjects; AND
- 12.5 credit points of IP-relevant or IP subjects.
Students who do not have a law degree from a common law jurisdiction or any prior legal studies or experience are also expected to complete the two-day preliminary subject Australian Legal Process and Legal Institutions.
Subject timing and format
The Melbourne Law Masters program has been designed around the busy schedules of working professionals. Subjects are offered from February to December each year. Most subjects are taught intensively over five days, with some subjects taught for two hours each week during the semester.
Subjects delivered online will have a combination of pre-recorded lecture content, live sessions and discussion boards among other resources. On-campus subjects involve interactive, seminar-style classes in the Law Building in Melbourne.
Duration
Full-time students enrol in 50 credit points per semester (or half-year period) and have an expected course duration of six months. Part-time* students enrol in 25 credit points per semester (or half-year period) and have an expected course duration of one year. Semesters without enrolments require a student to apply for a leave of absence.
*Part-time enrolment is for domestic students only. Part-time students may reduce their study load to 12.5 credit points per half-year period and thus have a maximum course duration of two years.
Overview of Intellectual Property
Overview of Intellectual Property is a two-day seminar that provides a general survey of the various regimes comprising intellectual property (IP). It is accredited by the Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys Board (TTIPAB) as satisfying part of its accreditation requirements for Topic Group A.
Professional accreditation
Completing the appropriate subjects in the Master of Intellectual Property Law may qualify you to register as a trade marks attorney and a patent attorney under the Trans-Tasman regime. In order to qualify you should first seek advice from the Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys Board and consult with Melbourne Law School on subject selection.
TTIPAB Accreditation
- TTIPAB Accreditations for Groups A, B, C, D, E, F, H and I are valid through to 10 April 2030.
- TTIPAB Accreditation for Group G is valid through to 16 November 2028.
*This subject is not available for academic credit in the Melbourne Law Masters program.
For detailed course and subject information, see the Handbook: Graduate Diploma in Intellectual Property Law.
Explore this course
Explore the subjects you could choose as part of this diploma.
Overview subject
This two-day introductory subject is compulsory for graduate diploma students with no previous training in law. It is highly recommended for international students who do not have a degree from a common law jurisdiction. Students are advised to attend Australian Legal Process and Legal Institutions prior to undertaking any other subject.
| Accordion | |
|---|---|
| Australian Legal Process and Legal Institutions · pts | |
IP subjects
| Accordion | |
|---|---|
| Copyright Law · 12.5 pts |
The subject explores this Australian intellectual property regime in predominantly black-letter terms. It asks students to consider the doctrinal issues implicated by the various aspects of copyright law: subsistence, ownership, infringement, exceptions to infringement and remedies. Also integrated with the curriculum are moral and performers' rights, and the treatment of internet service provider liability as an intermediary between copyright owner and infringer. The subject is structured within an international framework, explaining the importance of treaty norms and with selective use of comparative law. Indicative list of principal topics:
This subject will be delivered via a 'flipped classroom' model. The substantive content delivery will occur largely outside the classroom, with videos and notes provided to students via Canvas modules. Class hours will be spent applying and debating these principles (and related policy) in order to develop higher level cognitive, problem-solving, advocacy and reasoning skills. |
| Designs Law and Practice · 12.5 pts |
Design plays a critical role in the production and marketing of goods. Adequate protection of designs is important in order to encourage the creation of innovative products and thus enhance the Australian and New Zealand economies. This subject is primarily concerned with the laws in both countries. It will focus first on the registered regimes for protecting designs under the Designs Act 2003 (Cth), as well as the protection of designs as original artistic works under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). It will then deal with the differences of law and practice that arise under the Designs Act 1953 (NZ) and the Copyright Act 1994 (NZ). This subject meets the Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys Board (TTIPAB) requirements for ‘Topic Group I’. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Fundamentals of Intellectual Property · 12.5 pts |
Fundamentals of Intellectual Property provides a good introduction to intellectual property (IP) for students wishing to pursue more specialised graduate studies in this area. It also provides a general overview of IP law for students studying an overall commercial and trade law program. The objective of this subject is to provide an introduction to, and general overview of, the various Australian laws protecting IP, with reference to New Zealand IP laws. IP laws, including patent, design and copyright laws, are directed at the encouragement and protection of innovations in science, technology and cultural goods. IP laws, like trade mark and unfair competition laws also protect brands, reputations and other important commercial interests. The subject will also introduce the international framework of treaties under which the owners of IP from one country can seek protection in another country. The subject will be taught by:
This subject is delivered using a ‘flipped classroom’ approach. You will spend the pre-teaching period studying readings and viewings provided via Canvas modules to learn the key principles and policies. Then, in the on-campus seminars, we will discuss, debate, and apply these principles and policies to cultivate higher level cognitive, problem-solving, advocacy, and reasoning skills. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Fundamentals of Patent Drafting · 12.5 pts |
This subject teaches students the fundamental principles and basic skills of drafting patent specifications. It does so through a combination of in-class instruction sessions on a range of topics, in-class drafting exercises with review sessions, and out-of-class drafting exercises with tutorial review sessions. Students are assessed by two practical assessment tasks, undertaken individually outside the classroom. Passing the subject will satisfy the knowledge requirements specified by the Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys Board (TTIPAB) for Topic Group G: Drafting patent specifications. The lecturers for this subject include a number of practising patent attorneys with substantial experience teaching drafting skills. Indicative list of principal topics:
Teachers’ Note: This subject is an accredited subject towards qualification as a Trans-Tasman Patent Attorney by the TTIPAB. Students participating in this subject are mostly training patent attorneys who work in the intellectual property industry and have day-to-day contact with patent specifications as part of their job roles. Students who do not have such external exposure to patent specifications will find it challenging to pass this course. |
| Intellectual Property Protection in Asia · 12.5 pts |
This subject focuses on Intellectual Property (IP) protection in the Asia-Pacific region. Fuelled by its rising geopolitical importance, the region presents a complex and evolving landscape for IP rights. In this subject we will undertake a critical and comparative analysis of IP laws across key economies like China, India, Japan, and Southeast Asian countries. Our analysis will encompass large, developed economies and smaller, developing ones. Furthermore, we will explore how recent trade agreements, such as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), alongside various free trade agreements within the region and with major players like the US and EU, are shaping not only the regional but also the international landscape of IP protection. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| International IP Dispute Settlement · 12.5 pts |
Intellectual property (IP) occupies a central, if actively contested, place in international trade and political relations. * The COVID-19 pandemic saw widespread calls for international IP rules to be effectively suspended in the interests of global equity, while its defenders claimed the IP system was critical to a global response to the pandemic. National security issues and the fallout from geopolitical shifts are accentuating tensions over IP, which has become more than a trade or economic issue. Major disputes have arisen between the world's three major trading economies, China, the European Union and the United States, over how effectively IP should be protected. Developing countries contend with political and economic pressure when seeking to maintain and exercise policy space in their IP systems to pursue national development priorities. Australia has defended its tobacco plain packaging measures over how to reconcile IP protection with public health , with wider implications for how the public interest is to be balanced with private rights. Formal dispute settlement has had to address the relationship between national IP laws and measures for national security. The significance of IP as an investment asset has seen increasing prospect for disputes under investment treaties. International disputes over IP are an unavoidable consequence of the much stronger focus on IP in assessments of national economic and policy interests. But will these disputes be managed within the framework of the rule of law, or does economic and political power ultimately prevail? This is not a new question. From the mid 1980s, a growing perception that inadequate or unbalanced IP protection was undercutting the economic interests of major economies made disputation about IP inevitable. The resulting tensions were a critical factor behind the inclusion of IP standards in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) system of multilateral trade law, in the form of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement). Rather than resolving disputes over IP protection through bilateral wrangling and unilateral pressure, the rule of law would be applied in a predictable, transparent and equitable way through the multilateral dispute settlement mechanism maintained by the WTO, building on the major conventions separately administered by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). Yet TRIPS has been followed by a sharp rise in the conclusion of bilateral and regional trade and investment agreements that establish alternative or complementary sets of standards on IP and mechanisms to resolve IP disputes. The result is an intricate array of overlapping substantive standards and parallel forums for dispute settlement. And the very notion of settling disputes with reference to a stable and agreed body of law, through transparent multilateral procedures, faces a renewed challenge. The WTO's dispute settlement system is partially paralysed: the formal avenue for appeal remains in suspension, and governments seek to bridge their differences over reform proposals. This subject enables students to navigate this complex legal landscape and to deal with its consequences from three interlocking perspectives: the practice of dispute settlement practice, the legal principles and public policy implications, and international governance and the management of trade and political relations at a time of tension. This will cover key international cases, strategies for treaty interpretation and approaches to reconciling IP protection with other policy imperatives and with other legal and regulatory systems. The course will examine the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic and the international response to it, including proposals for a waiver of TRIPS obligations, and will address the public health dimension of dispute settlement. We will also consider the implications of the increasing reference to national security considerations in relation to IP law and policy, and recent disputes concerning enforcement of patents in critical areas of information and communications technology. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Internat.Issues in Intellectual Property · 12.5 pts |
Over the past two decades, the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs) globally has become a major issue both for right holders and users, and one that has had profound implications in a number of important areas of public discourse, such as international trade, public health, education and research, national development and the promotion of biodiversity. This subject seeks to engage with all these issues, and begins with a discussion of the sources of international intellectual property (IP) law, including the principal IP treaties and the general architecture of the international IP system. It then considers a number of case studies where particular IP issues arise and where international solutions are presently being negotiated. It will also examine the growing tension between the territoriality of IPRs and the global scope of IP exploitation, considering how this clash plays out in the key area of private international law. This subject consists of a survey of the economic, legal and political elements and forces that shape the international IP system. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Interpretation and Validity of Patents · 12.5 pts |
Reading and interpreting patent specifications is a central part of a patent attorney's daily practice. It is also a critical feature of any patent litigation where both sides will be competing for alternative interpretations that favour their client. This subject is intended to hone these skills of analysis and interpretation, working on the basic legal principles that students seeking Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys Board (TTIPAB) accreditation have already obtained through their study of patent law and patent practice. It is taught by experienced attorneys and litigators, and meets the TTIPAB requirements for 'Topic Group H'. This subject will be conducted with a number of case studies carried out by a team of practitioners to develop skills in the application of the rules of interpretation to patent specifications and in the application of Australian and New Zealand patent laws. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Patent Law · 12.5 pts |
For at least 400 years, patent law has been the primary regulatory mechanism for optimising innovation. With more than two million patent applications filed annually around the world, the patent system is both highly complex and of great economic importance. This subject provides the foundational knowledge necessary for a professional understanding of patent law and the patent system. It does so through a combination of instructional sessions and hands-on workshop sessions. The instructional sessions provide students with an understanding of the fundamental principles of patent law, with a particular focus on the requirements for the grant of a valid patent and infringement of a patent. In the workshop sessions, students apply these principles to actual patent claims, prior art and infringing embodiments. Consideration is also given to the protection of trade secrets through the action in equity to restrain a breach of confidence. While the focus of the teaching will be on Australian law, the differences between this and New Zealand law will be identified and explored throughout the subject. Comparative reference will also be made to the law of the United States and countries that are members of the European Patent Convention. Successful completion of this subject satisfies the knowledge requirements specified by the Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys Board (TTIPAB) for ‘Topic Group E’. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Trade Mark Practice · 12.5 pts |
This subject builds on the material covered in the Trade Marks and Unfair Competition subject. Trade Mark Practice focusses on the procedures and practices of the Australian Trade Marks Office in obtaining and maintaining registered trademarks. It covers the relevant aspects of New Zealand trade mark procedures and practice where these are different from those in Australia. Thus, this subject is particularly valuable for students wishing to prosecute trade mark applications through those offices. The rights, privileges and responsibilities of a patent attorney and a trade marks attorney are also covered in the wider context of attorneys’ professional conduct. The lecturers in the subject have extensive experience in the obtaining of trade mark registrations and the subject meets the Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys Board (TTIPAB) requirements for ‘Topic Group B’ and ‘Topic Group D’. The emphasis of this subject is on the documentation, procedures and practice of the Australian Trade Marks Office and the relevant aspects of New Zealand trade mark procedure and practice. The subject will be taught by:
Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Trade Marks and Unfair Competition · 12.5 pts |
This subject is concerned with the laws in Australia and New Zealand that protect trade marks. Trade marks play a pivotal role in the marketing of goods and services, and generally are one of a trader‘s most valuable assets. The protection of trade marks is thus of critical importance to all traders but is also important to consumers, who rely on the information conveyed by trade marks. This subject concentrates on the trade mark protection regime provided by the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), and involves a detailed study of the provisions of this Act and related case law, together with relevant aspects of the corresponding New Zealand laws and cases. The action for passing-off and actions for contravention of the Australian Consumer Law provisions in the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), and corresponding New Zealand statutory provisions, proscribing misleading and deceptive conduct are also covered. This subject meets the Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys Board (TTIPAB) requirements for ‘Topic Group C’. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Traditional Knowledge, Biodiversity & IP · 12.5 pts |
The conventional intellectual property (IP) system has historically been shaped by Western and European concepts of innovation, creativity, and originality, with implications for the theoretical structures and practical application of IP law. Responding to recent globalising trends in IP law, , developing countries and Indigenous communities have called into question the foundational principles of IP law, advocating greater recognition and respect of traditional knowledge (TK) systems and forms of cultural expression, and equity in the use of genetic resources (GR). This reframing of IP challenges the assumption that such material had 'fallen' into the public domain, free for exploitation without recognition or benefit sharing, akin to terra nullius. This reframing of IP law and policy has had diverse influence at theoretical and practical levels, spurring policy debate, international negotiations and legislative reforms, and influencing judicial decisions and IP office practice. International debate has probed the relationship between IP conventions, notably the WTO TRIPS Agreement, and other areas of public international law like human rights (UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples), environmental law (Convention on Biological Diversity), and cultural heritage law (UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions). In May 2024, the World Intellectual Property Organisation concluded the Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge, linking the patent system with GR and TK and recognising Indigenous Peoples and local communities. Developing countries have also integrated TK protection into recent trade agreements. Domestically, many countries are revising IP laws or developing sui generis laws to protect TK and traditional cultural expressions, to govern access to GR, and to recognise Indigenous People's collective rights. Several initiatives in Australia are reshaping the interaction between IP and Indigenous knowledge systems, including practical tools for recognising Indigenous knowledge and customary laws and protocols, applying principles of prior informed consent, and equitable benefit sharing. These developments have increasing practical implications for the practice of patent, trademark and copyright law. In this subject we will review the international legal and policy framework for TK and GR protection and survey domestic laws, mechanisms, and policy processes, with case studies from the Asia Pacific and Australia. We will also analyse tools within patent, trademark, and copyright law, critically utilise research databases. We will also feature guest lectures from Indigenous experts and representatives. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
IP-relevant subjects
| Accordion | |
|---|---|
| AI: Transforming Government · 12.5 pts |
The “administrative state” is the combination of many agencies and bureaucratic institutions exercising the practical power of government. It is traditionally aligned with the executive branch, and is subject to administrative law. But the administrative state is undergoing significant change in many Western liberal legal systems, due to the rapid uptake of algorithmic tools and decision support systems. For example, the United Kingdom’s Home Office used an automated system to make initial decisions on people’s visa applications, in a process that was later found to introduce racist discrimination. Where will these changes lead us? How does the turn to artificial intelligence (AI) further the aims and activities of the executive branch of government? In what ways does AI introduce tensions and conflicts, and how is it connected with broader transformations—intended and unintended? In this subject, students will gain knowledge of the technical systems being deployed in the administrative state today, as well as a broad overview of the impacts of algorithmic technologies. These include changes to decision-making, organisational change, the evolution of administrative processes, and involvement in transformative ideas like “government as a platform”. These changes will be considered in light of emerging public law and broader regulatory frameworks, including shifts in public law doctrine and fundamental principles. Students will also have the opportunity to consider bigger-picture effects on the rule of law, legitimacy and authority, public values, and changing modes of evaluation that accompany hybrid human-machine systems. The administrative state has always been a hybrid of political, technical and legal form – combining professional bureaucracy, scientific management and efficiency goals with political and normative theory, doctrinal law and resonant social values. Amidst contemporary debates over AI ethics, fairness and safety, the administrative state is a uniquely important site for examining the impact of data-driven algorithmic technologies on democratic institutions and public values. We will make regular reference to the Australian content, but examples and issues for discussion will be drawn also from the UK, USA, and the EU. |
| Artificial Intelligence and the Law · 12.5 pts |
Historically a computer was “programmed” by a human utilising a precise set of instructions. Within this paradigm the computer was able to “process” information “fed” to it and produce a particular output based on such programming and information. The human input was clear and transparent. As artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved in concert with the internet, cloud computing, big data gathering, data storage and data processing capabilities and the ubiquitous uptake of interactive smartphones and other “smart” devices, the relationship between the computer and direct and immediate human stewardship or control of outputs has become less readily identifiable. In turn this has given rise to significant legal issues. There are substantial legal implications of AI which require ongoing, flexible and informed responses from lawyers and legal policy makers. This subject seeks to inform practicing lawyers, legal policy makers and non-lawyers in respect of those issues and how they might be dealt with. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Biotechnology and the Law in Asia · 12.5 pts |
Biotechnology in Asia-Pacific is advancing at an unprecedented pace with major economies like China and Japan implementing ambitious national biotech strategies. This introductory subject offers an accessible yet comprehensive examination of biotechnology regulations across the region, requiring no scientific background. Students will explore legal frameworks governing healthcare and pharmaceutical safety, agricultural biotechnology, GMO and gene-edited food regulations, intellectual property, data governance, and economic security, with a focus on international cooperation in commercial development and national economic security considerations. Through comparative case studies, we will examine how Asian jurisdictions balance innovation, ethical considerations, and national security while responding to public health emergencies and biosecurity incidents. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Competition in Digital Markets · 12.5 pts |
Digital markets are affecting many aspects of our lives, transforming products, services, terms of trade, and even employment markets. The rising importance of big data, algorithmic decision-making, and online platforms create complex regulatory challenges for ensuring that the digital markets increase welfare. Competition law has an important role to play in this digital eco-system. Accordingly, this subject explores the complex challenges that digital markets pose to competition law. To do so, this subject will first analyse the unique characteristics of the digital environment and how they affect market dynamics. It will then analyse the main challenges to competition law, including coordination through algorithmic interactions, market power based on big data, abusive conduct by platforms and intermediaries, and defining markets and market power in digital eco-systems. It will also explore the intersection between competition, consumer protection and privacy, which is raising important institutional questions for the allocation and coordination of regulatory responses. This subject will explore global developments in this complex and fast-moving field. Drawing on the latest literature and major cases and inquiries, it will equip students to critically engage with and meet the challenges posed for business and its advisors and for policymakers, regulators and law enforcers in digital markets. This subject is led by two of the world’s competition law experts, with particular expertise in the regulation of digital markets. indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Digital Trade · 12.5 pts |
International trade is being transformed by the globalisation of the internet and the ability to move data across borders. Small businesses and firms in developing countries are using internet platforms such as eBay and Alibaba to engage in international trade. Software, music and books that used to be traded physically are now being transmitted digitally across borders; lawyers, consultants and other professional services are using the internet to reach new markets. Data analytics and cloud computing have become essential tools for firms in domestic and international markets. This subject will examine the impact of the internet and global data flows on international trade. Students will learn about the varied and innovative ways that the internet and data enable international economic activity. Students will look at how government regulation in areas such as privacy and national security affects digital trade and will examine the balance between achieving these goals and maximising opportunities for trade, growth and jobs. Students will learn about the extent to which international trade rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and free trade agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement support an open internet and global data flows; will identify gaps in law and practice; and will analyse where new global norms and rules are needed. Special topics covered may include: the opportunities of digital trade for developing countries and small and medium enterprises (SMEs); challenges posed by the 'Internet of Things' and privacy regulation; and digital trade and national security. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Entertainment Law · 12.5 pts |
This subject examines legal aspects of entertainment, an industry that has become largely internationalised. Technology now allows even local performers and distributors to reach audiences around the world, raising important issues and questions about which law applies in which jurisdictions. While some of these legal issues can be addressed in advance through agreements, doing so requires lawyers to have a firm grasp of the legal options available across multiple legal systems. Consider the performer Rosé, born in New Zealand and raised in Australia. She is a member of the globally active K-Pop group Blackpink based in South Korea. As a group member and a solo artist, she operates across a range of legal environments and activities. Her legal team, and the lawyers for those with whom she works, must navigate complex international choice-of-law questions. This subject pays particular attention to the United States, given its significant influence on global entertainment practices, while also examining questions of law in Australia and other jurisdictions. Case studies and examples are drawn from the fields of music, book publishing, visual and performing arts, and the various digital and physical media through which artistic content is distributed. A central theme will be the relationship between artistry and industry – how creative expression is supported, shaped, and constrained by commercial imperatives. Entertainment lawyers typically represent either the artists or the business interests behind their work. The two sides’ short-term goals may differ, but they share the ultimate goal of bringing creative works to audiences while generating enough revenue to sustain the process. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Information Technology Contracting Law · 12.5 pts |
Information technology is critical to almost all modern organisations and processes. The development, acquisition and use of such technology raises a myriad of complex legal issues extending beyond conventional contractual issues and includes ownership rights, rights of use and risk management. This subject explores those issues with a particular emphasis on contracting and intellectual property issues associated with the development and sourcing of information technology products and services. Both lecturers are information technology lawyers who have had extensive practical experience acting for both providers and purchasers of such products and services. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| International Law and AI · 12.5 pts |
This subject critically explores the intersection of international law and Artificial Intelligence (AI). We conceptualise AI as an ‘Algorithmic Leviathan’ – a powerful force reshaping global power, economies, and societies. Rather than a regulatory void, the course examines how existing international legal frameworks (in trade, human rights, humanitarian law, etc.) grapple with AI’s multifaceted impacts – from its resource-intensive creation and data extraction to its deployment in autonomous systems and decision-making. You will critically analyse attempts to govern AI, considering the interplay between states, corporations, and the risks of ‘regulatory capture’. The subject also explores AI’s potential to serve international law’s goals, such as enhancing access to justice, while remaining vigilant about biases and ethical challenges. Through lectures, discussions, and hands-on AI tool exercises (no coding background needed), you will develop a sophisticated understanding of how international law is responding to, and being reshaped by, AI’s advance. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Legal AI: Design and Development · 12.5 pts |
Generative AI has rapidly emerged across society, with much speculation about the opportunities and threats it poses. As a technology that fundamentally accepts natural language instruction, has an ability to reason on that language, and provides natural language output, there are parallels with the work performed by legal practitioners— who receive client instructions, apply legal expertise with the intent to achieve some outcome, and ordinarily provide a written output in the form of a contract, an advice or a submission. Advancements in tools that abstract away a lot of the underlying complexity mean that you no longer need to be a "software developer" to develop powerful, practical programs. Increasingly the focus is on having the domain expertise and imagination, rather than the technical skill. To best make use of the current capabilities of this technology, and to form a view on where it might lead, there is no substitute for lifting the hood and using the core components to build practical outputs. This provides a depth of understanding that cannot be obtained by theoretical study alone. Society will require legal practitioners who are able to understand, build, and critique the machinations of programs that use artificial intelligence (in particular, Generative AI). Accordingly, this timely and hands-on subject provides a much-needed set of tools for those engaged with law and technology: it steps through how to build Generative AI based programs for legal solutions, giving students an opportunity to put that learning into practice and become leaders in AI within their chosen career area. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| New Media and Communications · 12.5 pts |
The internet has given rise to new modes of communication. Services such as Netflix, Facebook and Google pose significant challenges for traditional models of communications regulation. At present, traditional media are arguably among the most heavily regulated sectors of the Australian economy, yet new media services go largely unregulated. This subject examines the conflict between traditional regulation of old and new media. Australia’s current regulatory arrangements arose in the 1990s and reflect the structure of the electronic communications industries at that time – focusing on the separate and highly prescriptive regulation of broadcasting and telecommunications. The current regulatory framework is fragmented and complex, and covers not only technical issues but also sector-specific competition, content and ownership rules. Since the 1990s, however, the communications environment in Australia has undergone a period of rapid and profound change. The emergence and ubiquitous adoption of the internet as a mass communications system has provided new opportunities for Australian publishers and audiences by dismantling traditional technological, economic and regulatory barriers to entry. From national security to sport, this revolution in communications has profound policy issues for national regulation in a global communications environment. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Online Streaming, Film and TV Law · 12.5 pts |
The world's first feature-length film was thought to have been produced in Australia in 1906. The Story of the Kelly Gang told the story of Australia's most infamous bushrangers and received distribution in Britain and New Zealand as well as in Australia. From 1906 onwards, Australian films and television programs such as Picnic at Hanging Rock, The Castle, Shine and The Sullivans have helped to define the particular cultural identity of Australians. This subject explores the issues associated with the production, financing and distribution of such films and television programs, with particular reference to feature films and sport and drama television programming (including online programs of a similar episodic structure and duration expected by television audiences, but which are distributed by online streaming). The distribution of films and television programs has been radically re-shaped since the early 1990s with the development of the Internet and the advent of online streaming. Online streaming has raised both opportunities and challenges for producers of films and television programs and has increased the complexities of the commercial and legal issues which must be addressed in the context of the production, financing and distribution of audio-visual material. The lecturers in the subject have worked as in-house counsel at an Australian television network, and in private practice acting for independent producers,adding to the practical relevance of the subject. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Principles of International Law · 12.5 pts |
This subject is an introduction to the foundational principles and rules of the public international legal order. It is designed to provide students with an understanding of the key concepts of international law, its history and contemporary relevance, sources of international law and the role of some key international institutions, such as the United Nations (UN). The subject is grounded in both theory and practice in order to consider how international law works in shaping and dealing with a range of global issues, including the creation, recognition and sovereignty of states, self-determination of peoples and the use of force in international relations. Using contemporary examples and case studies which address recent and current developments, students will critically evaluate the position and relevance of international law in international politics and society. The teaching integrates both content and skills in advanced legal research and writing. We will purposefully introduce students to the practices and protocols of advanced study in international law, as well as to the specialised knowledge and skills required of studying at postgraduate level in the Melbourne Law Masters. Indicative list of principal topics:
Important information about this SubjectThis subject is a pre-requisite for many other international law subjects in the Melbourne Law Masters. We recommend full-time students enrol in this subject when they first start their program of study. For part-time students, International Law (LAWS70173) is the alternative five-day intensive offering. All students enrolled in the following internationally focussed courses are strongly recommended to take either LAWS90295 Principles of International Law or LAWS70173 International Law (if you don't already have prior professional or educational background in public international law):
More information on course planning in the Melbourne Law Masters. |
| Privacy Law · 12.5 pts |
Privacy has been valued for centuries but now there is a resurgent interest in its protection as a result of new technologies, changing social norms and a rise of markets focused on the commodity value of information. Overlapping with the resurgent interest in privacy is a related concern about the management of data flows, especially on the part of government agencies and business organisations. The legal frameworks that deal with privacy and data protection have a long history but are coming under pressure to adapt to a more complex modern environment. In this subject, you will pay particular attention to the scope and nature of privacy protection as well as appropriate limits and exceptions, the ongoing pressures for law reform, and the practical operation of privacy and data protection laws in Australia and comparable jurisdictions. Indicative list of principal topics:
|
| Regulating Online Harms · 12.5 pts |
Online platforms are under increasing amounts of scrutiny, with states increasingly seeking to regulate the digital sphere. Online harms are a key target of these legislative interventions and pose unique challenges in the regulation of online content. Campaigns of disinformation and manipulation have plagued democratic elections, instances of ‘fake news’ have caused harm to public health, charities and governments alike have struggled to deal with the increase in online violence and abuse, and technologies pose new methods for bullying and harassment. However, regulating harmful content online is not a straightforward task. The global nature of the internet, the relative dominance of platforms, the volumes of content posted, and the complex and disparate nature of the different types of harm has made it difficult to develop effective regulatory frameworks. Regulatory approaches must be balanced against fundamental rights such as the right to freedom of expression and other policy interests, such as promoting competition and protecting data privacy. This subject will enable you to develop a critical understanding of the framework of laws regulating online harms, considering legal, policy, social, and ethical interventions. The subject will look at several overseas jurisdictions to assess wider patterns in online harms regulation and consider future developments, both in Australia and around the globe. Indicative list of principal topics:
|